Відео

Hello, I am studing EE and NEE in Chile and I need some reference to what depend EE, why they vary temporal and spacially, how emissions and concentrations are measured and how they impact on dispersion in Air Quality Models. Please help me

Great communication skills!

How to conduct or do comparative analysis of rural infrastructure and mobility of three region?

This video is messed up. Literally. The slideshow & speaker remained minimized in the upper right hand corner while the bulk of the screen shows a repeating "screen saver" slideshow of transit maps that are not apart of the presentation and appear to have been a pre-show filler or maybe apart of the speakers book? Either way, not being able to see the speaker or the slides is very disappointing.

Thank you.

Is there a link that could be provided to this presentation? I can't seem to find it on the website. Thank you.

*PromoSM* 😳

Won't a fed bank accounts plus a CBDC take care of a lot of these problems while reducing operating costs?

Thanks for making these seminars publicly available. It's helpful and I found this topic to be particularly interesting. I'd love to see the study repeated with e-bike characteristics in mind. As noted, some e-bikes are pint-sized, but many exceed the rack weight of 55 lb. limit on our bus racks. Transit agency reminds us that pulling the battery can reduce the weight, and we can carry that on. I think a critical question to try to dig into is this: The Netherlands has decided that transporting bikes on transit (except outside of commute times in limited volume) is forbidden, because it's just not feasible to move everyone and their bike. That assumption was made under the Dutch paradigm of cheap ubiquitous bikes, initially resulted in beater bikes at your work transit destination locked up all weekend, and ultimately resulted in the most massive bike share in the world, OV Fiets. This model assumes massive parking structures and massive bike count redundancy at train stations, which is arguably more trouble than actually devising transit that can haul all the bikes. The Dutch made these decisions with two early but maybe wrong assumptions, I believe: 1) not everyone will have to travel under the bike/train bike/tram paradigm. 2) bikes are worth a max. of $250 and you don't care about long range travel at your destination (ie no need for higher performance e-bike) What if those assumptions are wrong? What if everyone is traveling with micromobility + transit + micromobility on the other end for everything? In a car free world dominated by rail, not buses (because catanary not battery), long range e-bikes/e-trikes become the norm and our existing road structure is free and safe for their use. Rightsizing your e-bike for your needs (some will need much more assist than others or higher speed access) makes sense, and that cripples the OV Fiets paradigm. I know San Jose had a bike train that went from curiosity, to boon, to chaos from overuse rather quickly. The insight from that experiment was that people did NOT want to leave their expensive bike parked at a transit center all day and did not want to lose their personal bike's features on those critical last miles. But what if transit was carefully designed for 1 to 1 person to bike capacity with room for larger compact cargo bikes and trikes? Would boarding be too slow, or require moving the train once during boarding?

Thank you for presenting a great lecture and uploading this seminar. I have learned a lot of things from the lecture. Specifically, I was very inspired and motivated by the vision and research approaches of Professor Atiyya Shaw. Again, thanks for uploading such a great lecture. Hope to hear more from Professor Atiyya Shaw and UC Davis

ｐｒｏｍｏｓｍ

💞 p̾r̾o̾m̾o̾s̾m̾

Thanks for this wonderful lecture

There is nothing happier in this life if you're living healthy without any disease,I can say now I will be leaving happier because my only problem with Hsv 2 had been solved permanently I'm so grateful to; Dr Oseghale Sunday Herbal Home..

Very interesting information! It is important for people to learn and understand EV technologies and how EV charging and EV charging infrastructures work if we want people to comfortably make the switch to EVs.🚗 ⚡️

Very wonderful lecture, I am interested to understand in details concerning driving behaviours vs. vehicle emissions.

Excellent summary. Thanks

UC. good evening~ Super.cool !all the best!=))

This tool will be so useful in transportation analysis! I wonder though, could something similar be created to include walking, cycling, and transit numbers? It would make transportation analysis more accessible to residents and show increased network capacity when planning more sustainably.

Love the research topic. That's quite a number of businesses plotted. :) Well done.

Great 👍

Well explained. Thank you for sharing

asp8q vyn.fyi

EPA needs a cork to shove up their ass

Thanks a lot

This was super informative thank you

Tanks madam

How will this impact the development of Synthetic fuels? Efuel?

This is what happens when you have an academic who doesn't understand the difference between correlation and causation. If you added some lanes in some rural areas would more people drive? nope. In Seattle for example (where 40% of people commute by bus) when they added 10% lanes at the SAME TIME the population went up 14% guess what the volume went up 10% as well. Most people don't drive more just because it is faster and denser development closer to the city drives up the cost of housing which forces people to drive even longer distances. The cost of driving has to be balanced against the desire to own a single family home. Restricting traffic drives up the cost of housing and is a hidden tax on people.

Tesla provides Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) to its customers then Tesla is a winner on renewable fuel credit game. If Tesla holds back on V2G then Tesla has lost the game. IMO the Tesla company or its solar roof power wall divisions will never allow V2G. V2G will kill expensive solar expensive power wall expensive what Tesla calls inverter modules.

Does anyone have an email address for Dr. Shelley Francis? I'm with 350 Madison, in Madison WI, and we'd like to invite her to speak to us. I'm having trouble connecting with her! Thanks for any help. Sincerely, Tanace Matthiesen.

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 1.0 033021

Extraordinarily explained .

Between 2/24/21 and 12/9/20 CDC logged 1,038,084 deaths from ALL causes, 3,163 per million. During the same period CDC logged 217,382 deaths involving C-19, 662 per million. 65-74 accounted for 21.8% at 3,286 per million. 75-84 accounted for 28.9% at 8,363 per million. 85+ accounted for 31.8% at 22,914 per million. 30% of C-19 deaths are among those 85+, 2% of the population. 32.4% of C-19 deaths occurred in nursing homes, hospice or residence. To date 388,352, 81.1%, of ALL C-19 deaths are among those 65+, 16% of the population. 85.7% of the C-19 CASES are among those UNDER 65. 81.1% of DEATHS are among those OVER 65. Japan has the highest percentage of 65+, 27%, yet still under 8,000 deaths, 60.5 per million. What do they know/do the rest of the world does not? C-19 is not a problem for the young and healthy herd. Mother Nature and her buddy Grim Reaper are just doing their jobs, culling the herd of the too many, too old, too sick warehoused too close together as Medicare/Medicaid cash cows in poorly run (BLUE) contagious lethal elder care facilities. If C-19 is mostly killing off old sick people why are super-legislator Chancellor comrade Biden, his squad of t*&ts, Fauci, their minions and our elected morons suspending civil liberties, due process, bankrupting the country with lockdowns, distancing and masked clown shows? And the lying, fact free, fake news MSM left-wing coup de’tat propaganda machine has betrayed its responsibility to democracy and an informed public. Version 1.0 022721 UC Davis

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere, makes the earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere like that reflective panel set on the dash. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth becomes much like the moon, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory it gets from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a near ideal .95 emissivity black body which 4) it cannot do because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules. 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. All science backed up by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_climatechange-greenhouse-co2-activity-6749812735246254080-bc6K Version 1.0 022721

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere, makes the earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere like that reflective panel set on the dash. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth becomes much like the moon, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory it gets from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a near ideal .95 emissivity black body which 4) it cannot do because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules. 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. All science backed up by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_climatechange-greenhouse-co2-activity-6749812735246254080-bc6K version 1.0 022721 UC Davis

Is it fair to think that most people will move directly into EV ownership given the questions that most Americans have about this technology, its durability, and especially around range anxiety? (This is especially true the further you get from the city center.) Would shared use programs, such as car sharing, with EVs and supported with public charging options be a lower-risk option to allow consumers to "try before you buy" and to become more comfortable with the technology and the use cases that are applicable to each person? Are there other options outside of personal ownership that could also help to accelerate the adoption of EVs while also reducing emissions through incentives around reducing VMT, etc.?

great so clear.. make another video, please..

great, thanks

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere, makes the earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere like that reflective panel set on the dash. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth becomes much like the moon, a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which it gets from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a near ideal .95 emissivity black body which 4) it cannot do because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules. 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. All science backed up by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_climatechange-greenhouse-co2-activity-6749812735246254080-bc6K version 1.0 020221 CU

I think it is a very naive presentation if you think that by comparing the prices of shares (Tesla vs. Exxon) you can say something about the expected success of a possible upcoming energy transition. And not knowing what OECD means doesn't add to her credibility. Not really a successful presentation I think.

Thanks

Thank you for uploading. I find this really insightful and helpful. I have thoroughly enjoyed several studies conducted by Professor Dr. Kevin Fang on the topic - skateboard commuting and it has also inspired me as a student graduating in Sustainable Mobility Management next year.

*Trump Win = Runaway Hothouse Mass Extinction* -- Understanding Energy Green house gases up 45% in 30 years = Earth Hotter Faster 66% of humanity will live in water stressed areas by 2025 50% of thermal and hydro electric capacity will be threatened by water stress 20% of global energy is electricty 4% of global energy is renewable electricity To get 30% of energy from algae ponds requires land the size of Argentina 4% of mammals are wild by weight and bio energy land use threatens them 80% of global energy is fossil fuels and has been for over 25 years Solar & wind are 2% of global energy North Euro offshore wind turbines work 30% of the time North Euro onshore wind turbines work 22% of the time North Euro solar panels work 11% of the time The F-35 fighter jet works 11% of the time Europe burns 80% of the world’s wood pellets for renewable electricity It takes tree plantations 30 years to recoup 10% of their carbon offset We cut 15 billion trees, plant 5 billion, lose 10 billion per year Wildfires are more intense, frequent and bigger with drought & high temps Trees are growing faster and dying younger 40% of insect species could go extinct by 2050 Europe burns 80% of its recycled plastic & paper for recycled electricity Europe burns 50% of its palm oil shipments in cars & trucks Europe's carbon fund is rife with corruption Out of earth's 1.2 billion vehicles 6 million are electric Ten years fighting air pollution in China raised global north temperatures 0.1 °C *Earth is Hotter Faster * From 1971-2018 global net heating averaged 0.47 watts/m² From 2010-2018 global net heating averaged to 0.87 watts/m² = 46% higher Oceans took 89% of that heat and air took 1% This is rapid heat acceleration 350 ppm CO2 will not get Earth’s heat imbalance under control 300 ppm CO2 needed to cool earth *Sources:* We cut 15 billion trees per year, plant 5 billion, lose 10 billion / yr -- Tree Nation 2020 Trees are growing faster and dying younger -- Sci Am 2020 2020 : Fossil fuels remained 80% of global energy for over 25 years - CCN 2019 2020 : 2% of global energy is solar and wind ( after 20 yrs trying ) - IEA 2020 2020 : 4% of energy is renewable - WSJ BP 2019 : Greenhouse gases are up 45% in 30 years - NOAA 2020 2020 : Energy related emissions up 30% in 30 years - IEA 2020 2025 : 66% of people will live in water stressed areas - Nat Geo 2020 Water Stress Threatens Near 50% of World’s Thermal Power Plant Capacity - WRI 2017 Water Stress Threatens 30% of planned hydro projects - WWF 2019 2030 : Emissions must fall 50% in 10 yrs to stay under 1.5 C - Sci Am 2019 2030 : Emissions must fall 50% in 10 yrs to stay under 1.5 C - Insurance Journal 2019 2030 : We’ll make 120% more fossil fuel than needed to stay under 1.5 C - UN 2019 2040 : 15% of global energy will be renewable - IEA 2019 2040 : 15% of global energy will be renewable - WSJ BP 2019 2050 : Energy demand to increase 50% - EIA 2019 2050 : 30% of electricity will be renewable - EIA 2019 2018 : 18% of global energy is electricity 2040 : 24% of global energy is electricity US Energy Vulnerabilities To Climate Extremes - Energy gov 2013 -- Decreasing water availability in some regions and seasons -- Increasing intensity/frequency of storms, flooding, and sea level riseWater Energy and Land Insecurity: Global -- Science Daily 2020 -- heightened global risk to water/energy/resources for supply/demands *Weather* = flash floods + flash fires + flash mobs + flash infections *Climate* = 30 years of weather *Support James Hansen's monthly private dividends for real climate justice* 26 Nobel Prize winning economists support James Hansen’s monthly dividends, including: 3,589 U.S. Economists, 4 Former Chairs of the Federal Reserve and ALL 15 Former Chairs of the Council of Economic Advisers *Biden Win = Runaway Hothouse Mass Extinction* zzz zzzz

Zero-carbon means no more humans. That's the goal of the Climate Change religion.

Wow my first impression is - are all of these people from some international government entity who believe everyone will have access to rapid transit and live under some type of socialists government supported lifestyle. Government control of our utilities. Government control of our gas stations. Government control of our transportation modes. Government control of our antique vehicles and hot rods, not more car shows, no more auto day trips for pleasure. My good heavens we have an immigration policy that causes our country to grow by about 1,500,000 people every year and most of those people are not going to be able to afford a Tesla or some other EV vehicle priced at something over $15-25,000. And we are going to scrap and/or recycle our existing fleet of 279.6 million vehicles operating on roads throughout the United States. Here is an interesting quote: "Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) cars and light trucks on U.S. roads will climb by 36 million between now and 2030, despite predictions of their rapid replacement by Electric Vehicles. That’s according a new report from Lang Marketing Resources, a leading automotive market intelligence firm with over 30 years of experience in the vehicle products industry." I would start out by partnering with business and industry. Only then will you have am measure of success. Most Americans do NOT trust government to do anything. Two things government might be able to do is to progressively raise the gas tax to reduce our $27 trillion dollar debt. They also might be able to implement a nationwide carbon tax which is NOT returned to those which drive ICE vehicles. Use the money to reduce the cost of EV's. Sorry but I just find these types of plans a huge waste of time. WITHOUT government intervention have been able to make SIGNIFICANT increases in the use of renewable energy sources and managed to close down hundreds of coal plants WITHOUT government intervention. There are just a whole lot of American people who belIeve that government is the PROBLEM and certainly not any type of solution.

Safe yourself and children on the road. Bicycle RUSSIA - the BEST!!! ua-cam.com/video/76I5P1ggYQI/v-deo.html

Thank you very much!!!

This panel is incredible, but every time I hear (or read) Adonia, my myopic mind takes a big leap.

Great talk Dr. Barth!